Well, I have to be honest, I'm not a regular reader of this magazine.
When they contacted me to do this review / interview thing, I couldn't recall
what kind of magazine it was. I've heard of New Yorker with the neat illustrations
and all. Anyway, I heard that being written up in New York is some kind
of a status in the "art"world. Well, you know I moved to New York
initially to be in the "art"world, but things worked out really
differently and I have no idea what is happening in that world anymore.
An old "artist" friend of mine asked me once if I had been making
any "art" lately, so I described to him the things I have been
making, but he was kind enough to let me know that these things are not
really art. So, it must be a big mistake that New York magazine wrote about
me in their "art"section. It's a terrible mix-up. They should've
put me in the "not art"section or the "bespectacled doughnut
eating loonies" section.
